December 4, 2016

Almost half of Canadian homeowners unprepared for financial emergency: Survey

Manulife says among those polled, homeowners had an average of $174,000 in mortgage debt, with an average of 28 per cent of their net income going toward paying off their home each month.

By

An emergency fund is meant to be there in times of need, but a new survey suggests nearly half of Canadian homeowners would be ill prepared for a personal financial dilemma such as job loss.

The poll released Thursday by Manulife Bank found that 24 per cent of those surveyed don’t know how much is in their emergency fund, 14 per cent admit to not putting away any funds and 9 per cent only have access to $1,000 or less.

The remainder of those surveyed have up to $10,000 saved, with the average amount being $5,000.

Manulife Bank chief executive Rick Lunny says not having three to six months of expenses set aside can lead to desperation if a situation arises where you need to access money right away.

“The risk here is when they don’t have that money, and an unexpected event happens like you need a new furnace or a car repair, many of these people don’t have a choice but to lean on high interest cards,” he said.

Lunny noted that instead of taking advantage of the current low-interest rate environment to save money, the poll suggests that many homeowners are using it to buy more expensive homes.

“They’ve taken on large mortgages and as a result of that, they’re stretched in many ways,” he said. “Because of that, maybe they haven’t had the financial discipline to put aside rainy day money.”

Manulife says among those polled, homeowners had an average of $174,000 in mortgage debt, with an average of 28 per cent of their net income going toward paying off their home each month.

About half (46 per cent) of those polled say they would have difficulty making their monthly mortgage payments in six months or less if their household’s primary income earner lost his or her job.

Sixteen per cent say they would have financial difficulty if interest rates cause their mortgage payments to increase.

Mortgage data has been a hot-button topic in recent months as the federal government takes steps toward reducing the risks in the Canadian housing market, particularly in major cities like Toronto and Vancouver.

Earlier this month, Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced that stress tests will be required for all insured mortgages to ensure that borrowers would still be able to make their mortgage payments if interest rates rise or their financial situations change.

Last year, Ottawa raised the minimum down payment on the portion of a home worth over $500,000 to 10 per cent.

Lunny applauded the changes but says it doesn’t change the financial situation of current homeowners, who may already find it difficult to make mortgage payments.

The poll by Environics Research was conducted online with 2,372 Canadian homeowners from June 28 and July 8 of this year. Survey participants were between the ages of 20 to 69 with household income of $50,000 or more.

The polling industry’s professional body, the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population.

Trump has made this month the best time ever to get a five-year fixed mortgage

Special to The Globe and Mail

Donald Trump might have just made this month the best time ever to get a five-year fixed mortgage. The president-elect’s effect on the rate market could reinforce trends that are already making mortgages more expensive. Here’s why:

The Donald is bullish for rates

U.S. interest rates have surged as Mr. Trump’s trillions in expected infrastructure spending and tax cuts, protectionist job policies and deregulation will fuel economic growth, and hence inflation. Bondholders dread high inflation.

They also dread an unwieldy U.S. debt load, default risk and comments made by Mr. Trump, such as: “I would borrow, knowing that if the economy crashed, you could make a deal.”

With bonds coming off their biggest bull market in history, all of this has traders urgently selling before their profits evaporate. As bond prices fall, U.S. rates are surging, and they could keep climbing longer-term.

With Canada so linked to the U.S. economy, our rates are flying too. The billion-dollar question is whether Mr. Trump erects trade barriers with Canada that stunt our growth. That would keep a lid on rates. But with Canada being a key market for U.S. goods and services, a major source of commodities and U.S. investment, and with our wages being on par with those in the United States, we’re much less of a threat to Mr. Trump than Mexico.

In any event, keep an eye on Canada’s five-year bond yield, now 0.87 per cent. Most mortgage rates are tied to it. If it breaks definitively above 1 per cent, today’s record-low five-year rates may not be seen again for months, if not years.

Covert rate hikes

The Department of Finance has flung a slew of regulations at mortgage lenders. It’s imposed higher capital requirements, limits on selling mortgages to investors, reduced access to default insurance (which investors demand when buying mortgages), higher fees and insurance premiums and so on and so on.

By doing all his, regulators are slyly making lending more expensive behind the scenes. Lenders are passing these costs on to borrowers, like we saw last week with TD Canada Trust’s surprise hike to its mortgage prime rate. Expect more such stealth rate hikes in the next 18 months, especially if Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.’s new lender-loss-sharing proposal gets approved (and you can bet it will).

There’s a fire sale on fixed rates

You can now find five-year fixed rates that are lower than most variable rates. That’s an historical oddity that won’t last long-term.

As of today, the average discounted five-year variable tracked by RateSpy.com is 2.25 per cent. But you can fetch a five-year fixed rate for a juicy 2.19 per cent or less. In fact, some insured rates are below 2 per cent.

Could the Bank of Canada cut rates again? Sure. But that doesn’t mean lenders are going to drop their prime rate (much, if at all).

So a variable at a similar rate to a long-term fixed gets you maybe 0-30 basis points of potential benefit if rates drop again, in exchange for God knows what upside rate risk in a Trumpian economy.

Timing

Most of the best mortgage rates in the country come from mortgage finance companies. These non-bank lenders must insure their mortgages in order to sell them to investors. After Nov. 30, they’ll be forced to hike rates on a variety of mortgages as the Finance Department bans insurance on certain loan types. This could affect folks shopping for a refinance, amortizations over 25 years, $1-million-plus mortgages or rental financing.

Those with above-average debt loads and at least 20 per cent equity will also see their rate options shrink. That’s because, on Nov. 30, insured lenders must start testing borrowers to see if they can afford a payment based on the Bank of Canada’s five-year posted rate, currently 4.64 per cent. This leaves banks and credit unions – most of which have higher rates – as the main source of financing for folks with higher debt-to-income ratios. So if you’re thinking of consolidating debt, get off the fence now.

The nitty-gritty

Unless our economy seriously underachieves, despite Mr. Trump’s economic renaissance, we might look back on this month as one of the best times in history to get a five-year fixed rate. And if it’s not the best time, it will be right up there.

TD Bank raises mortgage prime rate to 2.85%

TD Bank has raised its variable mortgage rate for the first time since the summer of 2015.

Bank has held its mortgage prime rate steady since July 2015

CBC News Posted: Nov 01, 2016 1:21 PM ET

Toronto Dominion Bank has become the first major lender to hike its mortgage rates after Ottawa’s move last month to change some of the rules that govern insured mortgages.

The bank’s mortgage prime rate is rising 0.15 points to 2.85 per cent, effective immediately, after it had remained steady for 15 months.

Only customers with variable rate mortgages will be affected, the bank said in a statement, while fixed-rate customers should see no change. Other products such as lines of credit are not affected.

“We regularly review our rates and adjust them based on a number of factors, including the cost that TD pays to fund mortgages,” the bank said. “Increasing our rates is not a decision we take lightly. We consider the impact on our customers before proceeding with any rate change, and we communicate directly with customers whose loans or mortgages are affected.”

It’s rare for the big banks to leave much gap between themselves on their prime lending rates, so other major lenders are expected to follow suit. CBC News has reached out to Royal, CIBC, Scotiabank and BMO for comment, but none was immediately available.

James Laird, a co-founder of rate-comparing website RateHub and president of mortgage brokerage Canwise Financial, says he can’t recall the last time a major bank moved its prime lending rate out of step with the Bank of Canada, which has been on the sidelines for all of this year and is next scheduled to meet next month.

“That being said, there’s been some very major changes to the mortgage industry,” he said in an interview. “This could be in anticipation of higher funding costs when the new rules come in.”

In addition to a new stress test for borrowers, Ottawa also implemented new rules set to kick in at the end of this month that will make many types of mortgages ineligible for bulk insurance — which is one of the cheapest ways for lenders to insure their loans.

That means in less than a month, many lenders won’t be able to cut their costs by packaging their mortgages together and selling them to investors. That will raise the cost of mortgages everywhere, especially for non-bank lenders.

So TD moving to raise their mortgage rates could be a way of getting out ahead of those changes, Laird said.

“Without being able to ensure those mortgages,” Laird said “we can point to that as a likely reason for today’s news.”

Of Prime Interest: Mortgages for the self-employed

These days, as a result of the rules brought in over the past few years by the regulator of the country’s chartered banks, borrowing money to buy a home has become much more difficult for the 2.75 million Canadians who are self-employed—a group that according to Stats Canada has a higher median net worth than paid employees.

In the past, self-employed individuals with a 680+ credit score and their word they were earning enough from their business, could secure a mortgage with little or no documentation.

Today these same individuals are shocked to find they are no longer ‘approvable,’ even with a perfect repayment record of their existing mortgage.

The guideline B-20, which required federally regulated banks to tighten their approval process, has had a negative impact on self-employed individuals.

If you are self-employed or a business owner, you may be surprised to find that getting a mortgage without the conventional documents is not a simple process. The self-employed typically lower their taxable income by maximizing business expenses and personal deductions resulting in a discrepancy between what shows on their tax return and how much they actually do earn.These individuals have obtained their mortgage through what is referred to as “stated income” applications which require an impeccable credit history and a signed income declaration along with sound proof of the self-employment. Today they can still apply for a stated income mortgage but under B-20 they can only borrow up to 65 per cent of the value without the requirement of default insurance from Genworth, CMHC or Canada Guaranty. The criteria for qualification has increased and each insurers has different criteria.

So, what should you do if you are self-employed and want to buy a home, refinance your existing mortgage or switch lenders? Begin by having copies of your CRA Notice of Assessments for the last two or three years. Good credit is a must. Ensure your tax returns are filed on time and pay the taxes owing to create a positive picture of your finances.

You will be required to provide confirmation of your business. This can be as easy as providing a business license. A mortgage for a self-employed business owner “stating income” may, in some cases, result in a higher mortgage rate and higher mortgage insurance premiums.

If you are able to qualify with your self-employed earnings and there are ways a professional can assist with this, your rate will reflect the best rates offered.

Mortgage professionals  assist clients every day with their mortgage requirements. If you are unsure whether you can prove your income – talk to me.

Why It Pays To Put Less Than 20% Down When Buying a House

Why It Pays To Put Less Than 20% Down When Buying a House

Conventional wisdom says when you’re buying a home, a bigger down payment is always better. Not only will you lower your monthly payments by minimizing your debt, but a loan with a greater down payment offers more security for a bank. This should, in theory, make them more likely to lend.

Reality is a little different, however. Usually, folks with more than 20% down will get the same rates as those with a smaller down payment. Sometimes, though, people who put down less get even better rates.

Why would this be? It’s because of three little words. Mortgage. Default. Insurance.

In Canada, all mortgages with less than 20% down must have mortgage default insurance, insurance paid by the borrower that protects the lender in case of default. This insurance makes sure the lender doesn’t lose money on a deal that goes badly.

A part of the federal government, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, is the largest mortgage default insurer.

Once this insurance is in place, a bank has very little risk involved. A deal without mortgage insurance– one with more than 20% down– becomes more risky. Thus, that borrower has to pay higher rates.

Yes, a borrower will pay a premium for mortgage insurance, which can range from 1.25% to 3.60%. But that fee is only applied once, and could mean an annual interest savings of 0.25% or 0.50%, which means it could very well end up cheaper in the long run to pay for mortgage default insurance.

CIBC sells negative-yield bonds for 1st time

Bank sells 1.25 billion euros worth of debt guaranteed to lose money in long run

By Pete Evans, CBC News

CIBC, led by CEO Victor Dodig, sold its first ever negative yielding covered bonds this week.

CIBC, led by CEO Victor Dodig, sold its first ever negative yielding covered bonds this week. (Jeff McIntosh/Canadian Press)

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has become the first Canadian bank to sell bonds with a negative yield, and it had no problem selling the debt even though buyers are guaranteed to lose money if the debt is held to maturity.

The bank raised almost $1.8 billion via a bond sale of six-year debt that yields minus 0.009 per cent. That means anyone who bought the debt paid $100.054 for the right to get $100 back from the bank in 2022.

Despite the seemingly poor return, the bank had no trouble selling the euro-denominated bonds on Monday. The bond sale was two times oversubscribed, which means there were people willing to buy twice as much debt as there was debt available for sale.

Going negative

The bond sale makes CIBC the first Canadian bank to dip into a current appetite for negative-yielding bonds. But the lender is far from the only one to be selling investments guaranteed to lose money.

According to Bloomberg data, there is almost $12 trillion US worth of negative-yielding debt in the world now, much of which has come from governments and central banks that have cut their interest rates to record lows in order to stimulate the economy.

“Low yields may be great for governments, but they are lousy for savers and investors,” Hilltop Securities managing director Mark Grant said in a note

Investors have an appetite for such debt because the forecast for other assets is even worse. With stock returns looking dodgy due to fears about the global economy, lending money to a bank can seem appealing even if it’s guaranteed to lose a few pennies per dollar over time.

“As expected returns on ‘safe’ assets have diminished, investors have been forced up the ‘risk curve’ to obtain satisfactory returns,” Scotiabank said in a recent note to clients. “The search for yield will only become more desperate.”

The CIBC bonds are doubly appealing, because they are what’s known as covered bonds. That means they are backed by Canadian mortgages, so investors in the bonds have the right, theoretically, make a claim against those mortgages in the unlikely event the bank ever defaults on its loans. That gives investors two layers of protection, both in the bank’s creditworthiness, and from that of the underlying assets — the mortgages themselves.

The bonds have yet to be rated by an agency, but they are expected to get a pristine AAA rating for safety and creditworthiness, according to Bloomberg.

Before you sign that mortgage renewal offer, think carefully about your options

Garry Marr | May 1, 2016 

Twenty per cent of customers coming up for renewal each year will switch lenders to seek a deal — Here’s what to look for and what to avoid.

There’s a one-in-four chance that, if you’re among the 5.7 million Canadian households with a mortgage, you’re going to receive a letter in the mail this year telling you it’s time to renew.

TD Bank Financial Group said the number of renewals each year has climbed to 25 per cent as homeowners have switched to shorter terms, leading to more mortgages coming up for renewal every year.

“Traditionally, homeowners have gravitated to five years, that has been very popular,” said Pat Giles, associate vice-president, real estate secured lending, TD Canada Trust. “In recent years, we have seen the popularity of shorter terms emerge, the two-year terms, four years — meaning sometimes they (merge into the same renewal time) in one year like this.”

A 2014 report from the Mortgage Professionals Canada, which represents the mortgage industry, found 20 per cent of those customers coming up for renewal each year will switch lenders to seek a deal — something consumers are generally loathe to do because of perceived costs.

A better deal can include better terms, like large lump sum prepayment options, or it might mean just a straight out better rate. The difference can be meaningful: Discounted five-year closed fixed rates are as low as 2.3 per cent, but the posted rate at major banks is now closer to 4.8 per cent.

Retiring with a mortgage? Why you might want to think twice about that

Jonathan Chevreau | March 22, 2016 11:12 AM ET

When it comes to opining on seniors carrying debt into retirement, I’ll state upfront my personal bias that anyone with credit-card debt — or even mortgage debt — has no business fantasizing about retirement. To me, it’s simple: if you have debt of any kind, you keep working until it’s all discharged. As I have written elsewhere, I believe the foundation of financial independence is a paid-for home.

CREDIT GETTY IMAGES

The governor of the Bank of Canada recently mooted the possibility of negative interest rates, an exotic concept that sounds a little like anti-matter. Instead of receiving interest on you bank balance, you may eventually have to pay the banks for the privilege of holding your money! This bizarro world is not far off; Switzerland, for example, had negative interest rates on 10-year bonds for most of 2015.

That said, I recognize there’s a large segment of the population not fortunate enough to have a paid-for home, corporate pensions or financial assets like RRSPs and TFSAs. I personally know seniors who still rent and have no financial safety net. Some may have to resort to payday loans just to get by until the next month’s government-issued Canada Pension Plan, Old Age Security or Guaranteed Income Supplement cheques arrive.

Doug Hoyes, president of Kitchener-based bankruptcy trustees Hoyes Michalos & Associates Inc., profiles senior debtors every two years in his Joe Debtor study. The data are shocking. He defines seniors as 60 or older, so many are baby boomers either in retirement or on the cusp of it. (The oldest boomers, born in 1946, are now 70, while the youngest boomers, born in 1964, are 52 and presumably still working full-time.)

Senior debtors make up 10 per cent of Hoyes’ 2015 study, up from eight per cent four years ago and owe an average of $69,031 in unsecured debt, higher than any other age group. Nine per cent borrow against their income — often pension income — by resorting to payday loans.

Payday loans are, in my opinion, a form of usury — defined as debt instruments charging more than 60 per cent in interest a year. However, because the loans are only a few weeks in length (literally, until the next payday), the lenders can charge $20 for every $100 borrowed in Ontario, which if paid over a year would be interest of 546 per cent, Hoyes says.

Fifty three per cent of these senior debtors live alone and often cite illness or injury as a cause of their financial troubles. Among bankrupt seniors, nine per cent had payday loans. In some cases, their adult children are making financial demands and they’re too embarrassed to admit they have few alternative resources.

At the other extreme are the fortunate, wealthy boomers with paid-for homes, large defined-benefit pensions and maxed-out registered and even non-registered (taxable) investments. For them, says Emeritus Retirement Solutions president Doug Dahmer, the biggest expense will be tax, something that must be planned for well in advance. In this case, borrowing may turn out to be tax efficient.

Then there are the rest of us: perhaps with no large company pensions, modest financial assets and a home with only some equity in it, which may be a tempting source of future funds in retirement or semi-retirement.

This middle group is often torn between paying down the mortgage before retiring, or capitalizing on low interest rates to take a chance on building their financial nest eggs in the stock market.

Last July a CIBC poll found that, on average, Canadians expect to be debt free by age 56, although some are indebted well into their sixties. Even in the 45-plus cohort, more than 68 per cent are in debt, including 31 per cent who still have mortgages. In 2013, CIBC found 59 per cent of retirees were in debt.

But this may not be necessarily a bad thing, argues CIBC Wealth tax guru, Jamie Golombek. “There’s no harm in having debt if it’s for an appreciating asset. If you’re in your home for the long term and borrowing at low interest rates, it’s not a big problem. The problem is when you run out of cash flow to service the debt.”

Interest rates are near 60-year lows: posted five-year mortgage rates are under three per cent at most financial institutions (and under four per cent for 10 years). Of course, unless you lock in, there’s no guarantee rates won’t rise to more uncomfortable levels.

In a paper he wrote for CIBC last year (Mortgages or Margaritas), Golombek suggested the zeal to pay down debt could put some people’s retirements at risk. It was written in response to another CIBC poll that found 72 per cent of Canadians prefer debt repayment over saving for retirement. He found that if you can get 6 per cent annual returns in a balanced portfolio of investments, the net benefit was almost double that of paying down debt.

Back in 2012, BMO Financial Group tackled the same issue, noting that rising home prices meant real estate formed a disproportionate amount of couples’ net worths. This tempts some to tap into their home equity in retirement in order to overcome their past failure to save. As boomers become net sellers of homes instead of driving up prices, BMO said home prices could fall by one per cent per year. Downsizing, renting or moving to a small town are all ways to access some of the equity in your home.

Still, Hoyes has seen enough senior debt to argue against taking on more. “Low interest rates are great as long as you can make payments, but what if you lose your job, get sick or divorce? The fact moderate interest rates are only three per cent is irrelevant if there’s no money coming in. When your income becomes fixed, your expenses have to become fixed, but it’s hard: you can’t control the price of gas or car insurance.”

Personally, I like to have enough Findependence that you reach what Dahmer terms the “Work optional” stage. It’s about being in control of your days, Hoyes says, “If you have debt when you retire you are not in control of your day.”

And of course, medical expenses can creep up. It’s not as bad here as in the United States, where medical costs can have catastrophic consequences, but “In Canada medical expenses are insidious,” Hoyes says, “It’s a lesser amount, but creeps away and boomers are more likely to get whacked.”

One option, if available, is to work part-time in retirement. An analysis by Toronto-based ETF Capital Management found that if a retiree earns just $1,000 a month extra in consulting income or a part-time job, a nest egg’s depletion slows dramatically. For couples, if both partners earn that much, the financial picture is rosier still.

This may or may not be “optional” work. BMO found 29 per cent of Canadians expect to delay retirement and work part-time in retirement because of savings shortfalls. For them, BMO says, tapping home equity constitutes “Plan B,” one that 41 per cent of Canadians are considering.

But avoid reverse mortgages, Dahmer counsels. He says it’s more cost efficient to use a secured line of credit against the house. Draw funds only if needed, but set it up while you’re still working and the bank thinks you’re a good credit risk.

Dahmer thinks flexible use of debt through a line of credit is a sound strategy for smoothing spending in peak years, especially if your main income is from registered assets. “You’re far better off paying 2.5 to 3.5 per cent in interest for a few years than forcing yourself from a 33 per cent to 42 per cent marginal tax bracket, not to mention Old Age Security being clawed back.”

The savings can be in the hundreds of thousands: “Retirement is the one time in life that strategic tax planning can make a significant difference. That’s because of the many different places you can source cash flow from, each with its own distinctive tax implications.”

Illustration by Chloe Cushman/National Post

Financial Post

CMHC May Force Banks To Shoulder More Of The Risk Of Mortgages

 |  By Alexandra Posadzki, The Canadian Press

MORTGAGE HOUSE

TORONTO — Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation is continuing to explore the possibility of forcing banks to shoulder more of the risk associated with home mortgage loans.

During a speech in Calgary, CMHC president and CEO Evan Siddall said the option of requiring lenders to pay a deductible on mortgage insurance claims is still on a table.

According to speaking notes posted on the website of the federal housing agency, Siddall told his audience that the CMHC is working with a number of government entities, including the Department of Finance and the Bank of Canada, to examine ways of better distributing risk across the financial system.

The idea of having banks pay a deductible on mortgage insurance claims was first floated by CMHC under the previous Conservative government.

It’s been unclear whether the new Liberal government is interested in pursuing the idea.

household debt by age group

This chart from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives shows people in their 20s have the highest debt loads, but people in their 30s and 40s experienced the largest increase in debt since the turn of the century.

Homebuyers with less than a 20 per cent down payment are required to obtain mortgage default insurance from either CMHC or one of the private mortgage insurers.

The Canadian Bankers Association warned the previous government that shifting more mortgage risk onto the banks could threaten the country’s financial stability.

The industry association laid out its position in a letter to CMHC penned in August 2014, which was obtained by The Canadian Press through an Access to Information request last year.

The Department of Finance said last November that it had undertaken preliminary research to examine the impact of shifting more of the risk to the banks.

Siddall made his comments Monday during a luncheon hosted by the C.D. Howe Institute, a think-tank that once called for the privatization of the CMHC.

During his speech, Siddall defended the organization’s status as a public institution, arguing that it played an important role during the 2008 global financial crisis.

“As a Crown corporation with a public policy mandate, CMHC needs to be present in the market through all economic cycles,” he said.

“This is a fundamental way in which we contribute to Canada’s financial stability. In fact, our role now in Alberta is to support continuous access for Albertans to the housing market, even if private insurers choose to pull back.”

Albertans have highest debt load in Canada, Equifax says

Consumer debt in Alberta has jumped 17 per cent.

Consumer debt delinquencies jump 25% in province, 17% in Calgary

By Erika Stark, CBC News 

Albertans have the highest average debt load in the country at more than $27,000, says Equifax Canada.

A study released this morning says consumer debt delinquencies in the province jumped 25 per cent over the same quarter last year.

But the nationwide delinquency rate didn’t change, and Equifax Canada says rates remain at historic lows.

“Despite the ups and downs of today’s economy we’re seeing that Canadians are generally able to manage debt and rein in spending when they have to,” Regina Malina, the senior director of decision insights at Equifax Canada, said in a release.

“It may be a surprise to some, but the fact is delinquency rates in the oil-producing provinces are still relatively low. Most people are still finding a way to pay back what they owe.”

The Prairie provinces and Newfoundland — regions that have been the most impacted by the downturn — saw the biggest increase in delinquency rates. Tumbling oil prices have led to widespread layoffs in the oil and gas sector.

Another credit rating agency, TransUnion, reported last November that Alberta used to fall below the national average delinquency rate. That changed in the second half of 2015.

  • See the provincial delinquency rates here.

CONSUMER DEBT AND DELINQUENCYAverage debt in Calgary is $28,421 excluding mortgages, while Edmonton’s average debt is $26,479 compared to average consumer debt nationwide of $21,458.

The only age category to experience an increase in delinquency rates in the last quarter of 2015 was the under-26 group. The rate for that category rose 2.9 per cent.

“Debt is often used as a tool for consumers to accomplish their objectives. However, as people get older, their income earning capabilities generally trend downward,” Equifax said in a release. “To increase their financial security, Canadians should develop a plan to pay off their debt within a set timeframe.”

Equifax says interest rates will rise eventually and those relying on the availability of cheap credit will be tremendously vulnerable.

Canada’s total reported consumer debt is now at $1.621 trillion, compared to $1.529 trillion a year ago.